NUJ censorship and Ben Sullivan.

Open letter to the National Union of Journalists “Dear Colleagues, you are now imposing bans on anyone mentioning the Ben Sullivan false rape claims made in Oxford. Why is that? Can you give a list of topics which are forbidden? Love, Goggzilla”

Isn’t it odd that an organisation which espouses free speech and equality is so reticent to allow men’s rights activists any right to reply?

Taurus – new moon soon.

 

 

Advertisements

About Ciaran Goggins

Defeated UK at ECHR over innocent folks DNA sample retention, spokesman in Justice for Ched Evans campaign, now researching largest case of police perjury in UK legal history.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to NUJ censorship and Ben Sullivan.

  1. adeybob says:

    Reblogged this on adeybob's Blog and commented:
    Proof that it takes few words to make a big point.
    If there was a decent method and mechanism of complaint that would be heard by a decent arbiter, then we could dispense with the obvious tactics as mentioned by Gogg.
    The PCC was a noble thought that had a horse and wagons repeatedly run over it by the papers – an institution which was eventually flattened to a profile and full of holes.
    Post-Leveson, came IPSO – the PCC all growed up.
    IPSO – a voluntary organisation, battered into shape and forced to conform even before it was born…poured around the jelly of the Editor’s Code and left to set.
    It’s a joke. Hacked-off got what they wanted out of Leveson, and bollocks to the rest of us.
    Now, unless you’re rich, or pretty-well informed, you are excluded from even asking the papers for a response…and you need to read the small-print if you expect IPSO to do anything without a kick up their old-boy arse.

    • goggzilla says:

      I have taken to reading foreign papers to see what is happening in Britain. It is farcical that the NUJ ban another viewpoint, it smacks of Kafka and Orwellian nightmares.

      • adeybob says:

        some of these editors/journo’s should be shot for such a savage bias, and then left with a copy of the Editor’s Code in the throat, just to make sure they suck no more blood out of society.
        To be honest, the Code would have more of an effect, if it wasn’t written in crayon.
        And why are the worst of them usually climate deniers and wannabe MI5’s?

      • goggzilla says:

        Ponderous hand of Whitehall, I write on police corruption now it is Men’s Rights.

Comments are closed.