One of the most inaccurate articles ever written on the Daniel Morgan murder cover up is here –
Perhaps Jukes is trying to redo a press release and PR page for the Metropolitan Police? The “straight, brave, risk taking officer” he alludes to is currently trying to sell his house in Norfolk and flee Britain.
Look at the redacted Op Russell document, para 81. (……) joined Z Division on 3 Dec 73. Posted to CID 15 Dec 73. W Division Apr 76. None other than DEREK GORDON HASLAM.
It gets better. This paragon of virtue on whom Jukes builds his case is also in para 82.
26 Mar 77 caused death by drink driving. Haslam borrowed
stole a car from a Det Ch Supt and took a female colleague to dinner. Haslam then killed a pedestrian. 31 Mar 78 and Haslam appeared at Horseferry Magistrates Court where he was fined £60 on 8 May 78. On 20 Oct 78 Haslam was found guilty by the Met of four counts of a disciplinary nature related to the killing of the pedestrian, being a drunkard et al.
Ray Adams loathed Derek Haslam yet Jukes makes Haslam the prime source for tales of Adams supposed corruption. (This can be verified by reading “The Untouchables” Jukes, try it sometime).
ACC Winship is also quoted. He is as bent as a three pound note. Odd that Jonathan Rees was arrested twice by The Met yet not found guilty of the alleged murder of Daniel Morgan. Or is that a minor incident Mr Jukes?
Now to Sid Fillery, Jukes makes much of the conviction for child porn offences but omits Haslam’s possession of a Level One image. What would Haslam’s son P.C James A Haslam of King’s Lynn, Norfolk Police make of that?
Operation Abelard II and again Jukes does not point out that Haslam tampered with evidence (missing photos and documents signed in his brother David’s name) this is in the public domain Peter, try actually checking things, such as Haslam’s part in half a dozen cases of paid perjury and abuse of process plus other offences.
Finally, Ian Hurst. Not content with one Walter Mitty (Haslam tells all on the “My Telegraph” site that he was a Det Insp and awarded medals, had a Ph.D from Oxbridge) Jukes now heads into my bayou and cites “Martin Ingram” a proven fantasist who knew almost nothing about “Stakeknife” Freddie Scappaticci but is adamant that he is an expert.
Really Jukes please try harder. Ask Vikram Dodd?