Very Idiotic Perjurer.

To wrap up the Antony Watkins-Burton details. He was born in Leek, Staffordshire on 20 May 1957. His co-defendants were J Engels and J Raats, charges were dropped in their cases.

Both Watkins-Burton and his wife Julie have rap sheets in Belgium, but not in the UK after a sweet deal with HMRC. 

Now to more heartening news. The IPCC and MOPAC are looking at Derek Haslam’s perverting the course of justice in a dozen cases. Wonder why Jukes uses a 30 year old image of Haslam when there is a very recent one, his appearance on BBC Panorama whilst on “witness protection”.

article1457288821

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Very Idiotic Perjurer.

  1. thorella says:

    What do you mean by ‘a sweet deal with HMRC’?

    • goggzilla says:

      Nifty footwork was done behind scenes. Watkins-Burton evaded doing jail time in UK.

      • thorella says:

        In Barry’s appeal his defence team didn’t accept that Watkins-Burton served the prison sentence imposed on him. but in his decision the judge stated, ‘Following consultation with the prison authorities, the prosecution have assured the court that Watkins-Burton did serve the sentence imposed by the court.’

        I have to say, it’s common knowledge in excise frauds i.e London City Bond and other related Customs frauds that the prosecution deceived/guided by the NIS misled courts.

        So if Watkins-Burton didn’t serve time, why should that be?

      • goggzilla says:

        Darlow notoriously bent as a judge. MI5 probably smoothed the path for ex Major Watkins-Burton to return to UK without serving a custodial sentence.

      • thorella says:

        Yes, but why should they go to all this trouble for Watkins-Burton?

      • goggzilla says:

        As yet that is unanswerable but given the amount of traffic on here last night “someone” is anxious.

  2. thorella says:

    The Costello Affidavit. which can be found at https://wikispooks.com/w/images/3/37/Affidavit_-_Costello.pdf, makes certain allegations. Could it be possible the Met’s investigation into its authenticity was a sham?

Comments are closed.