Twisted Chris Spivey or truth sayer?

With the trial of the century (Vian & ors v Commissioner of the police of the Metropolis) taking a break until Monday* at 11 am in Court 76 under Justice Mitting, time to look at other news.

Chris Spivey is a divisive figure, I do not agree with his theories on Lee Rigby, but, as with Alison Chabloz, he either has the freedom to promulgate them, or we enter a realm whereby dissenting views are silenced. Who is so upset by Mr Spivey’s blog?

None other than Essex Police (you may recall them from such miscarriages of justice as the Lee Balkwell murder cover up, the cases of Michael Barrymore and that of Ch Insp Ben Hodder of Thurrock).

Spivey now faces a four thousand pound fine. Perhaps mortgage fraudster Peter Jukes could chip in a few grand?

*23 January, and still no sign of ex DCS Dave Cook. Police Scotland know he is in Kirkcaldy but are unable to track him down. Ought they to ask fellow bent cop Martin Bridger of Op Tempura infamy?

Or Cambridgeshire’s newest resident Derek Haslam? One hears he is trying to get off any charges on an insanity plea. He drives Asil Nadir and many others crazy.


About Ciaran Goggins

Defeated UK at ECHR over innocent folks DNA sample retention, spokesman in Justice for Ched Evans campaign, now putting the finishing touches to academic paper on who really murdered Daniel Morgan in 1987.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Twisted Chris Spivey or truth sayer?

  1. In Spivey’s case freedom of speech is one thing, but his online activities cross over the border into character defamation, harassment and hate crime. If Spivey had stuck to his racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia and both him, and Chabloz, had stuck to their holocaust denial (which though being illegal in some countries is legal in the UK) then British judicial system wouldn’t have had a problem with that. After all, Spivey and Chabloz are not unique: one can find opinions like theirs ten-a-penny on the free-for-all that is t’interweb. Moreover, Spivey claims to be anti-establishment yet he has not once given any criticism of now US president Donald Trump in his writings.

    Imho it’s a good thing that Spivey has lost his appeal because he has put the grieving family of Lee Rigby through hell over the past few years. It’s bad enough to lose a loved one in such senseless and traumatic circumstances, but to have a complete stranger and his online fans then come along and say that their loved one’s tragic murder never happened, that they are liars and he never existed must really count as a hurtful assault that causes a profound pain to them. And it wouldn’t surprise me if they, as a military family, are feeling duty-bound to stand up for their deceased loved one’s honour. Good luck to them, that’s what I say for I feel they are totally in the right. I hope Mr Spivey gets his just desserts.

    • What is hate crime? I do not agree with Chris Spivey’s theory on Lee Rigby and have told him so but I hold that he ought to be able to say it. As for TG hate what of Cathy Bug Brennan? A proven liar and alcoholic.

Comments are closed.