I am mulling over “the narrative” in light of the O’Loan report. The motive for the murder of private detective Daniel Morgan was never fully addressed. Both O’Loan and Goggzilla looked at adultery and links to a Maltese drugs cartel as probable causes. In a decade and a half of research what was uncovered?
There was no “major police corruption” story behind Morgan’s murder. That dates solely from 15 April 2003 onwards. The sole source was totally discreditted by the Independent Panel.
Fintan Creaven, can I prove that he did it? Not as yet, known fact is that the killer was in the Metropolitan Police and that Jonathan Rees, Morgan’s business partner, plus others, were used as convenient patsies. Police corruption is evident from the start. The question is far more Luke 3.10 (KJV) than exculpating Cressida Dick et al.